Towards a radical constructivist understanding of science
Foundations of Science 6 (1-3):1-30 (2001)
Abstract
Constructivism is the idea that we construct our own world rather than it being determined by an outside reality. Its most consistent form, Radical Constructivism (RC), claims that we cannot transcend our experiences. Thus it doesn't make sense to say that our constructions gradually approach the structure of an external reality. The mind is necessarily an epistemological solipsist, in contrast to being an ontological solipsist who maintains that this is all there is, namely a single mind within which the only world exists. RC recognizes the impossibility of the claim that the world does not exist. Yet, RC has the potential to go much further. I claim that RC provides the foundation of a new world-view in which we can overcome hard scientific problems. Thus, the paper is urging us to carry RC further, not just on philosophical grounds, but also into the domain of science.Author's Profile
Reprint years
2004
DOI
10.1023/a:1011305022115
My notes
Similar books and articles
Editorial: Can Radical Constructivism Become a Mainstream Endeavor?Alexander Riegler & Andreas Quale - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):1-5.
Radical Constructivism Has an Answer – But This Answer Is not an Easy One.D. I. Dykstra - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):22-30.
Physics develops unaffected by constructivism.Helmut Schwegler - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
All Quiet on the Constructivism Front – Or is there a Substantial Contribution of Non-Dualistic Approaches for Communication Science?A. Donk - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):27-29.
The radical constructivist view of science.Ernst von Glasersfeld - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (1-3):31-43.
Footprints in the Sand: Radical Constructivism and the Mystery of the Other.D. K. Johnson - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):90-99.
What Can We Learn from the Misunderstandings of Radical Constructivism? Commentary on Slezak's “Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite”.D. I. Dykstra - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):120-126.
Radical Constructivism in Communication Science.A. Scholl - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
21 (#542,943)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
2009-01-28
Downloads
21 (#542,943)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
United in Diversity: An Organic Overview of Non-Adaptationist Evolutionary Epistemology.Marta Facoetti - 2021 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 52 (2):211-225.
Second-Order Science of Interdisciplinary Research: A Polyocular Framework for Wicked Problems.Hugo F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):65-76.
Donald Davidson’s Critiques of Conceptual Relativism Applied to Non-adaptationist Evolutionary Epistemology and Refuted.Marta Facoetti - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (2):357-374.
Towards the Epistemology of the Non-trivial: Research Characteristics Connecting Quantum Mechanics and First-Person Inquiry.Urban Kordeš & Ema Demšar - 2019 - Foundations of Science 26 (1):187-216.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society.Bruno Latour - 1987 - Harvard University Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge.Hans Reichenbach - 1938 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.