In defense of iq testing

Educational Studies 8 (2):113-121 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1207/s15326993es0802_4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

“With friends like this...”: Three flaws in Chow's defense of significance testing.Richard J. Harris - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):202-203.
The historical case against Null-hypothesis significance testing.Henderikus J. Stam & Grant A. Pasay - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):219-220.
Testing significance testing: A flawed defense.John E. Hunter - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):204-204.
‘Just a Bit of Fun’: How Recreational is Direct-to-Customer Genetic Testing?Heike Felzmann - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (1):20-32.
Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW]Mary Briody Mahowald - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights,_ Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. _Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW]Mary Briody Mahowald - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
Testing as a selection tool: Another old and sticky managerial human rights issue. [REVIEW]George Munchus - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):817 - 820.
Chow's defense of Null-hypothesis testing: Too traditional?Robert W. Frick - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):199-199.
Democratic Experiments: An Affect-Based Interpretation and Defense.Michael Fuerstein - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (4):793-816.
Ethics and genetics: Susceptibility testing in the workplace.Chris MacDonald & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):235-241.
Is There a Right of National Defense?Thomas Peard - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:341-347.
Institute of Medical Ethics: working party report. HIV infection: the ethics of anonymised testing and of testing pregnant women.K. M. Boyd - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):173-178.
Increasing knowledge of hiv infection status through opt-out testing.Harold W. Jaffe - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):229-233.
Proportionality and Self-Defense.Suzanne Uniacke - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
Ethical considerations in the testing of biopharmaceuticals for adventitious agents.Richard S. Woodward - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):273-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
7 (#1,305,092)

6 months
2 (#1,114,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references