Social Integrity and Private ‘Immorality’ The Hart-Devlin Debate Reconsidered

Essays in Philosophy 2 (2):55-65 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a debate between tolerance and intolerance one is disinclined to side with intolerance. Nevertheless that, in a sense, is what I want to do in this paper. The particular debate I have in mind is the old one between H.L.A. Hart and Patrick Devlin about the legal enforcement of moral values. It should be noted, though, that the issue has by no means been settled in the minds of many people. The proposed repeal of the British law prohibiting the promotion of homosexuality (a law known as Section 28) “could destroy Scottish society,” according to Mazhar Malik of Glasgow’s Ethnic Community Resource Centre, echoing Devlin’s concern from the 1960s. In what follows I will first sketch and defend, partially, what I take to be Devlin’s communitarian argument and then attempt to explain what is wrong with it and how this should affect our estimation of the proper relation between law and morals. I will argue that at least some private ‘immorality’ can be defended without recourse to the liberal belief in a morally private sphere. In part I I look at the kind of communitarianism that can be found in Devlin’s work, in part II I support this reading of Devlin and expand on it by looking at some important passages from his work, and in part III I consider the reasons why his argument does not support legislation against gay sex, and, in fact, could be used to defend gay rights.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,439

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Clapham Omnibus Revisited: Liberalism against Democracy?Steven Lecce - 2003 - Contemporary Political Theory 2 (1):89-108.
The Immorality of Punishment: A Reply to Levy.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):113-122.
Enforcing Morality.Steven Wall - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):455-471.
Law, Liberty and Indecency.David A. Conway - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (188):135 - 147.
Replies.Martha Nussbaum - 2006 - The Journal of Ethics 10 (4):463-506.
Law, Liberty and Indecency.David A. Conway - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (188):135-147.


Added to PP

44 (#357,345)

6 months
15 (#236,862)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Duncan Richter
Virginia Military Institute

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A defense of abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.

Add more references