[Richards on evaluation]: Reply to Dickie
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (3):285 - 287 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
DOI
10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.0208b.x
My notes
Similar books and articles
Irreversible generalism: A reply to Dickie.Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):289-295.
The myth of passive perception: A reply to Richards.James J. Gibson - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (December):234-238.
The character and role of principles in the evaluation of art.James Shelley - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51.
A fitness model of evaluation.Richard A. Richards - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (3):263–275.
Aristotelica. By Herbert Richards, M.A. Grant Richards, 1915. 5s. net.R. G. Bury - 1916 - The Classical Review 30 (01):28-29.
Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
Diderot's Dilemma; His Evaluation Regarding the Possibility of Moral Freedom in a Deterministic Universe.Joyce A. Richards - 1972 - New York: Exposition Press.
Richards on evaluation.George Dickie - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (3):283 - 285.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-02-05
Downloads
210 (#60,751)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
2009-02-05
Downloads
210 (#60,751)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Engineered Niches and Naturalized Aesthetics.Richard A. Richards - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (4):465-477.
Can the Canberrans’ Supervenience Argument Refute Shapeless Moral Particularism?Peter Tsu - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (3):545-560.
