Phrenology Examined and Shown to Be Inconsistent with the Principles of Phisiology [Sic], Mental and Moral Science, and the Doctrines of Christianity. Also an Examination of the Claims of Mesmerism

Robert Carter & Brothers, 285 Broadway John D. Thorpe, 12 West Fourth Street (1849)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Edinburgh Phrenology Debate: 1803–1828.G. N. Cantor - 1975 - Annals of Science 32 (3):195-218.
The authority of human nature: the Schädellehre of Franz Joseph Gall.John van Wyhe - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Science 35 (1):17-42.
Courting the Cerebellum: Early Organological and Phrenological Views of Sexuality.Michael Shortland - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (2):173-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references