Movement in Language: Interactions and Architecture

Oxford University Press UK (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book is the most comprehensive, integrated explanatory account yet published of the properties of question formations and their variation across languages. It makes an important contribution to the current debate over whether syntax should be understood derivationally, arguing that the best model of language is one in which sentences are constructed in a series of operations that precede or follow each other in time. The central problem it addresses is the nature of the difference between languages in which all wh-words move overtly to a clause-initial position ; languages in which one wh-phrase moves per clause but all others remain in situ ; and languages in which there is no overt movement at all. Professor Richards focuses on the nature of syntactic movement in order to see what this reveals about the syntactic derivation. He considers the nature of interactions between movement operations and investigates the behaviour of multiple overt wh-movement, scrambling, cliticization, and object shift. His general conclusions about the relationship between movement and multiple specifiers follow straightforwardly from basic principles of Shortest Move and Shortest Attract. He develops a PF-imposed well-formedness condition on movement chains, which allows for the development of theories of anti-agreement, the that-trace effect, and the conditions on participial agreement in Romance, among other phenomena. He defends the claim that well-formed dependencies can improve the status of ill-formed dependencies created later in the derivation, illustrating the explanatory power, under certain structural conditions, of his Principle of Minimal Compliance. He uses data on the locality of wh-movement to argue that the Principle of Minimal Compliance is responsible for a number of the apparent distinctions between overt and covert movement. This book will interest syntacticians at graduate level and above as well as linguistic theorists concerned with the syntax-semantics interface.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,385

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophies of beauty.E. F. Carritt - 1931 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
On the Typology of Wh-Questions.Lisa Lai Shen Cheng - 1991 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The a/a-Bar Distinction and Movement Theory.Anoop Kumar Mahajan - 1990 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Chain Scope and Quantification Structure.Soowon Kim - 1991 - Dissertation, Brandeis University
Smuggling in syntax.Adriana Belletti & Chris Collins (eds.) - 2020 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement.Sigrid Beck - 1996 - Natural Language Semantics 4 (1):1-56.
Wh-in-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program.Tanya Reinhart - 1998 - Natural Language Semantics 6 (1):29-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-14

Downloads
10 (#1,222,725)

6 months
3 (#1,240,593)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Norvin Richards
University of Alabama

Citations of this work

Fragments and ellipsis.Jason Merchant - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (6):661 - 738.
On Logical Form.Danny Fox - 2003 - In Randall Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist Syntax. Blackwell. pp. 82-123.
Three kinds of ellipsis: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic?Jason Merchant - 2010 - In François Récanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftalí Villanueva (eds.), Context Dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references