Philosophy of Science 70 (2):264-279 (2003)

Richard A. Richards
University of Alabama
Ontological questions in biology have typically focused on the nature of species: what are species; how are they identified and individuated? There is an analogous, but much neglected concern: what are characters; how are they identified and individuated? Character individuation is significant because biological systematics relies on a parsimony principle to determine phylogeny and classify taxa, and the parsimony principle is usually interpreted to favor the phylogenetic hypothesis that requires the fewest changes in characters. But no character individuation principle identified so far is adequate. For biological systematics we need a better way of conceiving characters.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/375467
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Poverty of Taxonomic Characters.Olivier Rieppel & Maureen Kearney - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (1):95-113.
Philosophy and Phylogenetics.Joel D. Velasco - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):990-998.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
84 ( #140,032 of 2,519,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes