A Defense of Evolutionary Ethics

Biology and Philosophy 1 (3):265-293 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From Charles Darwin to Edward Wilson, evolutionary biologists have attempted to construct systems of evolutionary ethics. These attempts have been roundly criticized, most often for having committed the naturalistic fallacy. In this essay, I review the history of previous efforts at formulating an evolutionary ethics, focusing on the proposals of Darwin and Wilson. I then advance and defend a proposal of my own. In the last part of the essay, I try to demonstrate that my revised version of evolutionary ethics: (1) does not commit the naturalistic fallacy as it is usually understood; (2) does, admittedly, derive values from facts; but (3) does not commit any fallacy in doing so.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Naturalistic Fallacy.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Richmond Journal of Philosophy 13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-02

Downloads
76 (#198,818)

6 months
6 (#202,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Richards
University of Chicago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references