What argumentation can do for philosophy in the 21st century

Abstract

The author holds that the old theory according to which philosophy is the matrix of argumentation studies must be entirely reviewed currently. He argues that argumentation theory, as an interdisciplinary domain, may start playing, in new terms, the role which ― in the Cartesian tree ― was that of philosophy as the trunk of the different branches of human knowledge, as long as a set of requirements, which he lists, were met.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary on: Henrique Jales Ribeiro's "What argumentation can do for philosophy in the 21st century".Christopher W. Tindale - unknown
Henrique Jales Ribeiro (Ed.): Rhetoric and Argumentation in the Beginning of the XXIst Century . Coimbra University Press, Coimbra, 2009, 312 pp. [REVIEW]C. Andone - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):513-518.
Returning to the Relations Between Logic and Argumentation, and Other Classic Issues.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (4):1-5.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
On the origin of normative argumentation theory: The paradoxical case of the Rhetoric to Alexander. [REVIEW]AntoineC Braet - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (3):347-359.
Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.I. I. I. Mootz - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383.
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
Defining Rhetorical Argumentation.Christian Kock - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):437-464.
Manipulations in argumentation.Zinaida Z. Ilatov - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (3):359-367.
The Soundness of Pragmatic Argumentation: Does the End Justify the Means?Feteris T. Eveline - unknown
Virtues of visual argumentation: How pictures make the importance and strength of an argument salient.Jens E. Kjeldsen - unknown
Topics in Contemporary Legal Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Topical Nature of Legal Argumentation in the Continental Law Tradition.Guenther Kreuzbauer - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):71-85.
Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumentation in Judicial Decisions: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Harm Kloosterhuis - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):471-483.
Procedural Reasonableness and Normativity of Argumentation : Pragma-Dialectical Responses to Epistemologist Objections.Patrizio Lo Presti - unknown
The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient.Jens E. Kjeldsen - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (2):197-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

A Retórica como paradigma filosófico.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - 2022 - Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 31 (61):9-40.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
From a Logical Point of View.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1953 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references