Should We Believe in the Big Bang?: A Critique of the Integrity of Modern Cosmology

PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:228 - 237 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We analyse aspects of the Big Bang program in modern cosmology, with special focus on the strategies employed by its adherents both in defending the theory against anomalous data and in dismissing rival accounts. We illustrate this by critically examining four aspects of Big Bang cosmology: the interpretation of the cosmic red-shift, the explanation of the cosmic background radiation, the inflation hypothesis and the search for dark matter. We conclude that the Big Bang's dominance of contemporary cosmology is not justified by the degree of experimental support it receives relative to rival theories

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
201 (#96,220)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The structure and interpretation of cosmology: Part II. The concept of creation in inflation and quantum cosmology.Gordon McCabe - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (1):67-102.
The structure and interpretation of cosmology: Part I—general relativistic cosmology.Gordon McCabe - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (4):549-595.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references