Commercial predictive testing: the desirability of one overseeing body

Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (4):282-286 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Europe a process of harmonisation of standards and regulations on genetic testing has started. Public discussion and consultation are recommended, but it is not clear in every European country how the decision making process as regards the further introduction of genetic testing services should be formed. In this paper the usefulness and importance of an overseeing body for genetic screening and testing is founded on four lines of reasoning: analysis of the role of value judgments in the use of the concept of abnormality; a balancing of potential benefits for all parties involved; a balancing of potential disadvantages, and the greater availability of commercial genetic tests in the future. It is further argued that such an overseeing body has advantages for all the interested parties

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Predictive testing and oncogenes.Frederick P. Li - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (2):194 – 196.
Predictive testing and population screening.Anne Slowther - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (1):11-13.
Predictive testing for Huntington disease.M. Huggins & M. R. Hayden - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):47-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
17 (#843,162)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?