Journal of Business Ethics 143 (2):289-305 (2017)
AbstractIn this article, we offer an approach of how participative stakeholder innovation can be evaluated in complex multistakeholder settings that address wicked issues. Based on the principle of mutual value creation, we present an evaluation framework that accounts for the social interaction process during which stakeholders integrate their resources and capabilities to develop innovative products and services. To assess this evaluation framework, we collected multiple data from the case study of the Swiss Cardiovascular Network, which represents a multistakeholder setting related to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Our findings indicate that the evaluation dimensions of the stakeholders’ mindsets, the process and context of the stakeholder interactions, as well as the outcomes are useful concepts to account for a cooperative process of innovation in a multistakeholder setting. We discuss both the theoretical and practical insights of our analysis for participative stakeholder innovation.
Similar books and articles
A critique of the innovation argument against a national health program.Alex Rajczi - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (6):316–323.
Does the private finance initiative promote innovation in health care? The case of the british national health service.Pythagoras Petratos - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):627 – 642.
Stakeholder Governance as a Response to Wicked Issues.Sybille Sachs, Edwin Rühli & Claude Meier - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):57-64.
Revitalizing primary health care and family medicine/primary care in India – disruptive innovation?Rakesh Biswas, Ankur Joshi, Rajeev Joshi, Terry Kaufman, Chris Peterson, Joachim P. Sturmberg, Arjun Maitra & Carmel M. Martin - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (5):873-880.
Aesthetic, Emotion and Empathetic Imagination: Beyond Innovation to Creativity in the Health and Social Care Workforce.Deborah Munt & Janet Hargreaves - 2009 - Health Care Analysis 17 (4):285-295.
Solidarity and the Role of the State in Italian Health Care.Nicola Pasini - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (4):341-354.
Health Care Reform: Lessons from the Past, Lessons for the Future.Gail R. Wilensky - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):725-727.
Problematic Notions in Dutch Health Care Package Decisions.Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wija Oortwijn - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (4):287-294.
Is caring a viable component of health care?Samuel Gorovitz - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (2):129-133.
Managed care: How economic incentive reforms went wrong.Madison Powers - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):353-360.
A Reflection on Moral Distress in Nursing Together With a Current Application of the Concept.Andrew Jameton - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (3):297-308.
Privacy and Confidentiality Issues in Primary Care: views of advanced practice nurses and their patients.Terry Deshefy-Longhi, Jane Karpe Dixon, Douglas Olsen & Margaret Grey - 2004 - Nursing Ethics 11 (4):378-393.
Beyond health outcomes: The benefits of health care. [REVIEW]Gavin Mooney - 1998 - Health Care Analysis 6 (2):99-105.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainability: Designing Decision-Making Processes for Partnership Capacity.Adriane MacDonald, Amelia Clarke & Lei Huang - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (2):409-426.
Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future.Daniel Laude, Anna Heikkinen, Heta Leinonen, Sybille Sachs & Johanna Kujala - 2022 - Business and Society 61 (5):1136-1196.
The Impact of Stakeholder Identities on Value Creation in Issue-Based Stakeholder Networks.Thomas Schneider & Sybille Sachs - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 144 (1):41-57.
Collaborative Sustainable Business Models: Understanding Organizations Partnering for Community Sustainability.Barry A. Colbert, Amelia C. Clarke & Eduardo Ordonez-Ponce - 2021 - Business and Society 60 (5):1174-1215.
Who Has a Seat at the Table in Impact Investing? Addressing Inequality by Giving Voice.Guillermo Casasnovas & Jessica Jones - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 179 (4):951-969.
References found in this work
Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance.Jeffrey S. Harrison & Andrew C. Wicks - 2013 - Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (1):97-124.
Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives.Sébastien Mena & Guido Palazzo - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3):527-556.
Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management.Julia Roloff - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):233-250.
Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital.Thomas Maak - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):329-343.