On modal logics between {$\roman K\times\roman K\times \roman K$} and {${\rm S}5\times{\rm S}5\times{\rm S}5$}

Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):221-234 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We prove that everyn-modal logic betweenKnandS5nis undecidable, whenever n ≥ 3. We also show that each of these logics is non-finitely axiomatizable, lacks the product finite model property, and there is no algorithm deciding whether a finite frame validates the logic. These results answer several questions of Gabbay and Shehtman. The proofs combine the modal logic technique of Yankov–Fine frame formulas with algebraic logic results of Halmos, Johnson and Monk, and give a reduction of the representation problem of finite relation algebras.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Worlds and Times.Ulrich Meyer - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):25--37.
Times in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2):201--19.
Why Does Time Pass?Bradford Skow - 2011 - Noûs 46 (2):223-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Modal Logic.Yde Venema, Alexander Chagrov & Michael Zakharyaschev - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (2):286.
Two-dimensional modal logic.Krister Segerberg - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1):77 - 96.
Cylindric Algebras. Part II.Leon Henkin, J. Donald Monk & Alfred Tarski - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):651-653.
Fibring Logics.Dov M. Gabbay - 2000 - Studia Logica 66 (3):440-443.

View all 6 references / Add more references