- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
When Did Carl Correns Read Gregor Mendel's Paper? A Research Note
Isis 86:612-616 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Carl Correns' Experimente mit "Pisum", 1896-1899.Hans-Jörg Rheinberger - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (2):187 - 218.
William Bateson's Introduction of Mendelism to England: A Reassessment.Robert Olby - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (4):399-420.
Heredity and its entities around 1900.Author unknown - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
From Linnaean Species to Mendelian Factors: Elements of Hybridism, 1751–1870.S. Müller-Wille & V. Orel - 2007 - Annals of Science 64 (2):171-215.
Der Mendelismus Und Die Philosophischen Probleme der Modernen Genetik.Ivan Timofeevich Frolov & S. A. Pastushnyi - 1981 - Akademie Verlag.
Mendelizm I Filosofskie Problemy Sovremennoi Genetiky.Ivan Timofeevich Frolov & Stefan Alekseevich Pastushnyi - 1976 - Mysl.
History of Plant Hybridization According to Mendel's Contemporary Rudolf Geschwind.Vítězslav Orel - 1986 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 8 (2):251 - 263.
A Conceptual Ambiguity that Contributed to the Neglect of Mendel's Paper.Iris Sandler & Laurence Sandler - 1985 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 7 (1):3 - 70.
Was Mendel's paper on Pisum neglected or unknown?Michael H. MacRoberts - 1985 - Annals of Science 42 (3):339-345.
Inconmensurabilidad teórica y comparabilidad empírica: el caso de la genética clásica.Pablo Lorenzano - 2008 - Análisis Filosófico 28 (2):239-279.
The real objective of Mendel's paper.Floyd V. Monaghan & Alain F. Corcos - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):267-292.
Research note: Genes on chromosomes: The conversion of Thomas Hunt Morgan. [REVIEW]Muriel Lederman - 1989 - Journal of the History of Biology 22 (1):163-176.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-01-31
Downloads
16 (#880,136)
6 months
7 (#425,192)
2015-01-31
Downloads
16 (#880,136)
6 months
7 (#425,192)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
‘History will be kind to me’: An introduction to new directions in the historiography of genetics.Yafeng Shan, Ehud Lamm & Harman Oren - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 99 (C):A1-A3.
Exemplarising the Origin of Genetics: A Path to Genetics (From Mendel to Bateson).Yafeng Shan - 2016 - Dissertation, University College London
Re-discovering Mendel: The Case of Carl Correns.Hans-Jörg Rheinberger - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (1-2):51-60.
Why the Rediscoverer Ended up on the Sidelines: Hugo De Vries’s Theory of Inheritance and the Mendelian Laws.Ida H. Stamhuis - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (1-2):29-49.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo