Medical oath: use and relevance of the Declaration of Geneva. A survey of member organizations of the World Medical Association

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):189-196 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The Declaration of Geneva is one of the core documents of medical ethics. A revision process was started by the World Medical Association in 2016. The WMA has also used this occasion to examine how the Declaration of Geneva is used in countries throughout the world by conducting a survey of all WMA constituent members. The findings are highly important and raise urgent questions for the World Medical Association and its National Medical Associations : The Declaration of Geneva is only rarely used as an oath text despite the fact that physicians’ oaths are generally widespread. This is not consistent with the intention and claim of the Declaration of Geneva. The article then discusses three questions. Should there be one single binding oath? Which organization should be responsible for such an oath? Which oath is the most obvious candidate? In a globalized world and despite all cultural diversity, the medical profession should have one core moral basis which is binding for physicians all over the world. The most obvious candidate for an oath incorporating this moral basis is the Declaration of Geneva.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Hippocratic Oath and the ethics of medicine.Steven H. Miles - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The ethics activities of the world medical association.John R. Williams - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):7-12.
The 50th Anniversary of the Declaration of Helsinki: Progress but Many Remaining Challenges.J. Millum - 2013 - Journal of the American Medical Association 310 (20):2143-44.
Resurrection of the Hippocratic Oath in Russia.Pavel Tichtchenko - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (1):49.
Freedom And Responsibility In Genetic Testing.Baruch Brody - 2002 - Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):343-359.


Added to PP

42 (#380,196)

6 months
23 (#120,318)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?