Is There an Individual Sociality, or On the Way to Individualized Social Theory

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (5):62-79 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article discusess the problem of individual sociality, which developed during the transition from the traditional to the individualized society and become relevant for the knowledge of new social problems in modern society. The article focuses on the concept of sociality, its new properties and new meaning, revealed through its individual dimension. In this regard, the author identifies two types of sociality – collective and individual socialities, indicates the conditions of their development, analyzes their role in the formation of society. Individual sociality is considered as a new form of sociality that emerged as a result of evolution. The article demonstrates the role of individual sociality in the organization of modern sociality, in the formation of society as an individualized society. The author argues that the research of these issues requires a new, individualized social theory. Thus, the description of this theory is presented, the problems that arise before it in the new social cognition are determined. These are primarily the problem of the individualized subject of knowledge, the problem of the individualized language of knowledge, the problem of the individualized method of knowledge and others. Finally, the article highlights the issues facing the new social theory in order to comprehend the development of modern society, the article identifies the social forces that will solve these issues. Thus, one of these social forces is individual intelligence as the main reserve of the creative forces of modern humanity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Communitarian dimension of social integrity problem.Yuliia Yu Brodetskaya - 2015 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 7:77-87.
The Principle of Unlinearity in the Research of Social Formation of Personality.Evgenia M. Nikolaeva - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:997-1002.
Toward a Network Sociality.Andreas Wittel - 2001 - Theory, Culture and Society 18 (6):51-76.
Heidegger, Sociality, and Human Agency.B. Scot Rousse - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):417-451.
Modus of social integrity: practice of constructing productive co-being.I. I. Brodetskaya - 2016 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 10:56-68.
论个体自我认同危机.Yan Yin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 36:293-297.
Modus of social integrity: Practice of constructing productive co-being.I. I. Brodetskaya - 2016 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 10:56-68.
Social networks as inauthentic sociality.Tanja Staehler - 2014 - Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 2 (2):227-248.
Communitarian Dimension of Social Integrity Problem.Yuliia Yu Brodetskaya - 2015 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 7:77-87.
Facets of sociality.Nikolaos Psarros & Katinka Schulte-Ostermann (eds.) - 2007 - New Brunswick: Ontos.
Three Dimensions of the Sociality of Action.Frithjof Nungesser - 2012 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4 (1):178-207.
Modest Sociality: Continuities and Discontinuities.Elisabeth Pacherie - 2014 - Journal of Social Ontology 1 (1):17-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-04

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The German Ideology.Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels - 1939 - Science and Society 3 (4):563-568.
What Is a Symbiotic Superindividual and How Do You Measure Its Fitness?Frédéric Bouchard - 2013 - In Frédéric Bouchard & Philippe Huneman (eds.), From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. pp. 243.
Subject, Object, Cognition.V. A. Lektorsky - 1987 - Studies in Soviet Thought 34 (4):271-273.

Add more references