Why we should prefer knowledge

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):79-93 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses Plato’s question from the Meno : Why should we prefer knowledge that p over mere true belief that p? I find I just do prefer knowledge, and not for any further benefit that I am aware of in the particular case. But I should have that preference, because given our practice of approving of testimony only if uttered with knowledge, I could fail to prefer knowledge, when other things seem to me to be equal, only by having the sorts of serious social or psychological defects that would make me unresponsive to the approval of others. Finally, the social practice that produces this particular preference is good for all of us because it improves the average quality of the testimony we receive, which results in greater success in our projects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowledge on Trust.Paul Faulkner - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Freedom, preference and autonomy.Keith Lehrer - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (1):3-25.
Team preferences.Robert Sugden - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):175-204.
Testimony as a Social Foundation of Knowledge.Robert Audi - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (3):507-531.
Testimony, knowledge, and epistemic goals.Steven L. Reynolds - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (2):139 - 161.
Adaptive Preference.H. E. Baber - 2007 - Social Theory and Practice 33 (1):105-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
89 (#184,948)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven L. Reynolds
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

What's the point of knowing how?Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):693-708.
What's the Point of Authors?Joshua Habgood-Coote - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Knowledge Is (Still) the Norm of Assertion.Kok Yong Lee - 2017 - NCCU Philosophical Journal 37:33-74.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The structure of empirical knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Knowledge and practical interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.Wilfrid Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.

View all 34 references / Add more references