In Michael J. Deem, Emily Farrow & Robin Grubs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Genetic Counseling. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2022)

Authors
Joel Michael Reynolds
Georgetown University
Abstract
[Forthcoming Fall 2022] Informed consent is a central concept for empirical and theoretical research concerning pregnancy management decisions and is often taken to be one of the more fundamental goals of the profession of genetic counseling. Tellingly, this concept has been seen by disability communities as salutary, despite longstanding critiques made by disability activists, advocates, and scholars concerning practices involved in genetic counseling more generally. In this chapter, we show that the widespread faith in informed consent is misleading and can be detrimental to the practice of genetic counseling as guided by concerns of justice and equity. We proceed in two steps. First, we explain how informed consent is flawed as a practical concept. Second, we show how the inadequacy of informed consent illuminates the animating core of disability critiques of genetic counseling: the issue of ableism. We argue that the problem of ableism cannot be solved with informed consent because it is not merely a problem of information, but also of epistemic frameworks. We suggest that what we call critically informed consent is better suited to move genetic counseling from being aware of the problem of ableism to becoming actively anti-ableist.
Keywords Genetic Counseling  Disability  Informed Consent  Non-Directiveness  Ableism  Genetic Testing
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Non-Directiveness in Genetic Counseling.Fuat S. Oduncu - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):53-63.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Informed Consent and Genetic Information.O. O'Neill - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (4):689-704.
Parental Consent for Newborn Screening in Southern Taiwan.M.-C. Huang - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):621-624.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-20

Total views
211 ( #53,480 of 2,499,382 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #12,205 of 2,499,382 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes