Governance of Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences: Advancing Global Consensus on Research Oversight: proceedings of a workshop

Washington, DC: National Academies Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Continuing rapid developments in the life sciences offer the promise of providing tools to meet global challenges in health, agriculture, the environment, and economic development; some of the benefits are already being realized. However, such advances also bring with them new social, ethical, legal, and security challenges. Governance questions form an increasingly important part of the discussions about these advances--whether the particular issue under debate is the development of ethical principles for human genome editing, how to establish regulatory systems for the safe conduct of field trials of gene drive-modified organisms, or many others. However there are continuing concerns that the knowledge, tools, and techniques resulting from life sciences research could also enable the development of bioweapons or facilitate bioterrorism. Between June 10 and 13, 2018, more than 70 participants from 30 different countries and 5 international organizations took part in an international workshop, The Governance of Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences: Advancing Global Consensus on Research Oversight, in Zagreb, Croatia. Hosted by the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, the workshop was a collaboration among the InterAcademy Partnership, the Croatian Academy, the Croatian Society for Biosafety and Biosecurity, and the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop."--Publisher's description.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dual Use Research: Investigation Across Multiple Science Disciplines.Shannon Oltmann - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):327-341.
The dilemma of dual use biological research: Polish perspective.Marek Czarkowski - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):99-110.
Agent-Based Models of Dual-Use Research Restrictions.Elliott Wagner & Jonathan Herington - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2):377-399.
Responsible conduct by life scientists in an age of terrorism.Ronald M. Atlas - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):293-301.
The concept of governance in dual-use research.Alex Dubov - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (3):447-457.
Dual use opportunity and public health infrastructure.Thomas May - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):206-207.
Four Paradigms of Clinical Research and Research Oversight.Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Christine Grady - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):82-96.
Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues.Nicholas G. Evans - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):268-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-07

Downloads
4 (#1,595,600)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references