Hypatia 29 (4):925-941 (2014)

Authors
Martina Reuter
University of Helsinki
Abstract
The article investigates the philosophical foundations and details of Mary Wollstonecraft's criticism of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's views on the education and nature of women. I argue that Wollstonecraft's criticism must not be understood as a constructionist critique of biological reductionism. The first section analyzes the differences between Wollstonecraft's and Rousseau's views on the possibility of a true civilization and shows how these differences connect to their respective conceptions of moral psychology. The section shows that Wollstonecraft's disagreement with Rousseau's views on women was rooted in a broad scope of philosophical disagreement. The second section focuses on Rousseau's concept of nature, and I argue that Rousseau was neither a biological determinist nor a functionalist who denied that nature had any normative significance. The section ends with a discussion of Wollstonecraft's criticism of Rousseau's application of the distinction between the natural and the artificial. The third section focuses on Wollstonecraft's critique of Rousseau's claim that there are different standards for the perfectibility of men and women. The article concludes with a critical discussion of the claim that Aristotle would have provided Wollstonecraft with the philosophical tools she needed for her criticism of Rousseau
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/hypa.12105
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Women in Western Political Thought.Susan Moller Okin - 1980 - Princeton University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Imagination.Martina Reuter - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1138-1160.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Educational Relationships: Rousseau, Wollstonecraft and Social Justice.Morwenna Griffiths - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (2):339-354.
Mary Wollstonecraft i feministyczna krytyka Emila J.J. Rousseau.Justyna Wodzik - 2012 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 84 (4):349-361.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Transparency and Obstruction.Jean Starobinski - 1988 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-01

Total views
84 ( #138,259 of 2,504,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #140,251 of 2,504,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes