The Value of Apparently Incoherent Positions

Abstract

Incoherence arguments are intended to demonstrate that some philosophical position should be rejected because it is fatally flawed. I review the kinds of fatal flaws targeted in incoherence arguments, and argue that such arguments are not conclusive against the position they target, but merely pose challenges that require greater imagination. Furthermore, I claim that apparently incoherent positions have an instrumental value in expanding the intellectual resources of philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Is there a logic of incoherence?Andre Kukla - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):59 – 71.
Graded Incoherence for Accuracy-Firsters.Glauber De Bona & Julia Staffel - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (2):189-213.
On the Coherence of Strict Finitism.Auke Alesander Montesano Montessori - 2019 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):1-14.
On the Incoherence of Legal Language to the General Public.Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (1):41-59.
The Incoherence Objection in Moral Theory.Eric Wiland - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (3):279-284.
The Incoherence of Christian Theism.Edwin Curley - 2003 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 11 (1):74-100.
Paradox and Relativism.H. Muhammad Legenhausen - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 11 (21):75-80.
Concrete Universals and Spatial Relations.Antti Keskinen, Jani Hakkarainen & Markku Keinänen - 2015 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 11 (1):57-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-18

Downloads
185 (#103,520)

6 months
33 (#100,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Ressler
University of Melbourne (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ways of worldmaking.Nelson Goodman - 1978 - Hassocks [Eng.]: Harvester Press.
Against method.Paul Feyerabend - 1975 - London: New Left Books.
In contradiction: a study of the transconsistent.Graham Priest - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The coherence theory of truth.Nicholas Rescher - 1973 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
Some problems of philosophy.William James - 1911 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by Frederick Burkhardt, Fredson Bowers & Ignas K. Skrupskelis.

View all 24 references / Add more references