Semiotica 2018 (224):313-336 (2018)

Abstract
Throughout his life, Jurij Lotman lived at the crossroad between different worlds, ages, and cultures. The many authors, cultures, and ideas that shaped his thought and influenced his theories are scattered at either side of countless geographical, political, and cultural borders, beginning with the one that separates “Russian culture” from “European culture,” porous and ambiguous as any boundary. The task of reconstructing how Lotman’s ideas came to being, how they shifted their meaning as their context shifted, is more and more a crucial task not only for the historian. Many Lotmanian concepts, first and foremost that of semiosphere, are acquiring major relevance not only for semiotics itself and its branches, such as the rising political semiotics, but also for many neighboring disciplines, such as cultural studies and political sciences. Therefore, gaining a better understanding of the meaning of Lotman’s ideas could be of value also for the applied semiotician or the political analyst. The present paper is the result of research started in the Lotman Archives in Tallin, Estonia. Through an analysis of archival material, it aims at reconstructing the origins and meaning of the most political tropes of Lotman’s theories, especially what I will call his theory of the political subject. In the first part, I will argue that, in order to understand this political aspect of Lotman, it is necessary to take into consideration the intellectual debates inside which the author started his intellectual journey in 1930s–1940s Soviet Russia, and how he sought answers to those debates in the works of G. W. Leibniz. In the final part of the paper, I will try to show how this reconstruction of Lotman’s history could contribute to the contemporary debate in semiotics and other connected disciplines.
Keywords Gottfried Wilhelm leibniz  Jurij Lotman  history of semiotics  political semiotics  theory of subject
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/sem-2016-0198
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Christian Wolff and Leibniz.Charles A. Corr - 1975 - Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (2):241.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leibniz and Prime Matter.Shane Duarte - 2015 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (3):435-460.
Pour Iouri Lotman.Iu M. Lotman & Olga Scherer-Virski - 1995 - Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. [REVIEW]Stephen Puryear - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
Reid on Leibniz’s Monad and the Conceptual Priority of the Whole.Tamar Levanon - 2017 - International Philosophical Quarterly 57 (1):81-95.
Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad.Daniel Garber - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
U-Monad Topologies of Hyperfinite Time Lines.Renling Jin - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (2):534-539.
Husserl, the Monad and Immortality.Paul MacDonald - 2007 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 7 (2):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-27

Total views
10 ( #903,667 of 2,520,438 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,438 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes