- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Are the New EPA Regulations Concerning Intentional Exposure Studies Involving Children Overprotective?
IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (5) (2007)
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency has adopted new regulations that prevent the agency from conducting or funding intentional exposure research involving children, pregnant women, or fetuses. I argue that these regulations overprotect children, and that the EPA should revise them to conform with Subpart D of the Department Health and Human Services’ regulations governing research with humansAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Informed Consent in Pediatric Research.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):346-358.
Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.
Deception research involving children: Ethical practices and paradoxes.Celia B. Fisher - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):271 – 287.
The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.Toby Schonfeld - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (3):189-206.
Knowledge of Regulations Governing Pediatric Research.Annemarie Stroustrup, Susan Kornetsky & Steven Joffe - 2008 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (5):1-7.
How should risks and benefits be balanced in research involving pregnant women and fetuses?C. Strong - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (6):1-5.
Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?David Wendler & Seema Shah - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):1 – 7.
Responding to the challenge of the children's health act: An introduction to children in research.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2):101-106.
Parents' and Children's Perceptions of the Ethics of Marketing Energy-Dense Nutrient-Poor Foods on the Internet: Implications for Policy to Restrict Children's Exposure.K. P. Mehta, J. Coveney, P. Ward & E. Handsley - 2014 - Public Health Ethics 7 (1):21-34.
Ethical principles in federal regulations: The case of children and research risks.Peter C. Williams - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):169-186.
U.S. Federal Regulations for Emergency Research: A Practical Guide and Commentary.Andrew McRae & Charles Weijer - unknown
Pediatric Participation in Non-Therapeutic Research.Marilyn C. Morris - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (3):665-672.
A New Approach For Regulating Bisphenol A For The Protection Of The Public's Health.Leila Barraza - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (s1):9-12.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-05
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2015-02-05
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Paternalism and Utilitarianism in Research with Human Participants.David B. Resnik - 2012 - Health Care Analysis (1):1-13.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-v4fj8 uwo