Does Heath Have a Good Answer to Steinberg?

Business Ethics Journal Review 7 (3):14-20 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Etye Steinberg has recently raised a problem for Joseph Heath’s Market Failures Approach. In this paper we consider a response by Heath. We argue that Heath’s response not only leaves the original problem intact, but also raises a second one, analogous to stakeholder theory’s so-called “identification problem.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Narveson.Jan Narveson - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (2):373-378.
Professor Heath’s Canada.Jan Narveson - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (2):363-.
Being Serious about Being Good.Eugene Heath - 2009 - In Julian Friedland (ed.), Doing Well and Good: The Human Face of the New Capitalism. Information Age. pp. 69--85.
Steinberg’s reply.Md David Steinberg - 2003 - Lahey Clinic Medical Ethics Journal 10 (1):7-7.
Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen, Personal Value. [REVIEW]Mark Alfano - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (1):166-170.
What is a Good Answer to an Ethical Question?Katherina Glac & Christopher Michaelson - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 9:233-258.
What is a Good Answer to an Ethical Question?Katherina Glac & Christopher Michaelson - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 9:233-258.
On Some Ways in Which A Thing Can be Good.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):96-117.
Theory Assessment and Coherence.Peter Brössel - 2008 - Abstracta 4 (1):57-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-26

Downloads
24 (#563,024)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Repp
Longwood University

References found in this work

A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation.R. Edward Freeman - 2001 - Perspectives in Business Ethics Sie 3:144.
The General Theory of Second Best.R. G. Lipsey & Kelvin Lancaster - 1956 - Review of Economic Studies 24 (1):11-32.

Add more references