The women radium dial painters as experimental subjects (1920–1990) or what counts as human experimentation
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 12 (4):233-248 (2004)
AbstractThe case of women radium dial painters â women who tipped their brushes while painting the dials of watches and instruments with radioactive paint â has been extensively discussed in the medical and historical literature. Their painful and abhorrent deaths have occupied the interest of physicians, lawyers, politicians, military agencies, and the public. Hardly any discussion has concerned, however, the use of those women as experimental subjects in a number of epidemiological studies that took place from 1920 to 1990. This article addresses the neglected issue of human experimentation in relation to the radium dial painters. Although womenâs medical examinations have been classified as simple, routine measurements of radiation burden on the body and presented as a great offer to humanity, for more than fifty years those women had been repeatedly used as experimental subjects without proper consent. I argue that through this case it becomes obvious that the issue of defining what counts as human experimentation shifts from an epistemological to a serious ethical and political question, concerning the making of scientific knowledge while issues of gender related to this process are also discussed
Similar books and articles
Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies.Anna C. Mastroianni, Ruth R. Faden & Daniel D. Federman (eds.) - 1994 - National Academy Press.
The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - Cambridge University Press.
Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law and Social Policy.David N. Weisstub (ed.) - 1998 - Pergamon Press.
Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation: A Sociological Study of the Conduct and Regulation of Clinical Research.Bradford H. Gray - 1981 - R.E. Krieger Pub. Co..
Feminism and Environmental Ethics A Materialist Perspective.M. Mellor - 2000 - Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):107-123.
Ethical Issues in Experimentation on the Human Fetus.LeRoy Walters - 1974 - Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (1):33 - 54.
Experiments at the Intersection of Experimental History, Technological Inquiry, and Conceptually Driven Analysis: A Case Study From Early Nineteenth-Century France.Ursula Klein - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (1):1-48.
Human Experimentation: A Guided Step Into the Unknown.William A. Silverman - 1985 - Oxford University Press.
Of Rats and Women: Fetal Sexuality and Hybrid Agency.Alice Adams - 2004 - Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3):205-221.
Verification and Variation: Patterns of Experimentation in Investigations of Galvanism in Germany, 1790–1800.Maria Trumpler - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):84.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
1945–1964 WHO’s Right to Health?Linda M. Richards - 2022 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 30 (2):137-165.
The Politics of Radiation Protection.Maria Rentetzi - 2022 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 30 (2):125-135.
References found in this work
Review of Thomas S. Kuhn The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. [REVIEW]David Zaret - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (1):146.
The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation.George J. Annas - 1992 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England.Steven Shapin - 1988 - Isis 79:373-404.
The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England.Steven Shapin - 1988 - Isis 79 (3):373-404.
Revising the History of Cold War Research Ethics.Susan E. Lederer & Jonathan D. Moreno - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):223-237.