Creating Shared Value as Institutionalization of Ethical Responsibilities of the Business Corporation as a Good Corporate Citizen in Society

In Josef Wieland (ed.), Creating Shared Value – Concepts, Experience, Criticism. Cham: Springer Verlag (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses Michael Porter’s paradigm of creating shared value based on the criticism of corporate social responsibility by Milton Friedman in the perspective of contemporary debates on legitimacy and good corporate citizenship. This is a development of the argument presented by Jacob Dahl Rendtorff concerning the liberal property rights paradigm of business ethics in his book Responsibility, Ethics and Legitimacy of Corporations. This article discusses the work that Michael Porter has developed together with Mark Kramer, which can be presented as a strategic approach to business ethics and corporate social responsibility. This work began with Porter’s concept of Strategic Philanthropy Harvard business review on corporate social responsibility, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003) which became Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility :78–92, 2006) and gradually developed into the concept of Creating Shared Value :62–77, 2011). We see how Michael Porter integrates the critical perspective on CSR from Friedman in a strategic concept of philanthropy, corporate social responsibility and creating shared value. Accordingly, the concept of creating shared value should be considered as a development of the ideas of strategic philanthropy and corporate social responsibility in the perspective of capitalism and freedom. At the same time, however, the concept of creating shared value is broader and more oriented towards society and towards the idea of profit-based CSR since it integrates the values of society and business in corporate legitimacy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethical significance of corporate law.Jeffrey Nesteruk - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):723 - 727.
The moral responsibilities of stockholders.Richard J. Klonoski - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):385 - 390.
The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility.Janine S. Hiller - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2):287-301.
GM and corporate responsibility.Richard T. De George - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177-179.
GM and corporate responsibility.Richard T. George - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177 - 179.
Revisiting the Role of “Shared Value” in the Business-Society Relationship.Mark Aakhus & Michael Bzdak - 2012 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 31 (2):231-246.
Corporate Responsibilities for Access to Medicines.Klaus M. Leisinger - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S1):3 - 23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-28

Downloads
20 (#744,405)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacob Dahl Rendtorff
Roskilde University

Citations of this work

Moral foundations for creating shared value in Asia.Hamid Khurshid & Robin Stanley Snell - 2021 - Business and Society Review 126 (4):479-511.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references