British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):257-270 (2012)

While some film theorists and philosophers have seen motion as a necessary element of cinema, this view is challenged by a body of avant-garde films which offer little or no movement. These experiments—by film-makers such as Andy Warhol, Larry Gottheim, and Michael Snow—challenge essentialist definitions of film, while simultaneously foregrounding the crucial role played by duration in cinema’s ontology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ays021
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,226
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Existentialist Cinema.William C. Pamerleau - 2009 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Deleuze on Cinema.Ronald Bogue - 2003 - Routledge.
Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema.Christian Metz - 1974 - University of Chicago Press.
The Poetics of Cinema.Richard Taylor & Boris Ėĭkhenbaum (eds.) - 1982 - Rpt Publications in Association with Dept. Of Literature, University of Essex.


Added to PP index

Total views
142 ( #81,410 of 2,499,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,732 of 2,499,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes