Vaccines Mandates and Religion: Where are We Headed with the Current Supreme Court?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 49 (4):552-563 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that the Supreme Court should not require a religious exemption from vaccine mandates. For children, who cannot yet make autonomous religious decision, religious exemptions would allow parents to make a choice that puts the child at risk and makes the shared environment of the school unsafe — risking other people’s children. For adults, there are still good reasons not to require a religious exemption, since vaccines mandates are adopted for public health reasons, not to target religion, are an area where free riding is a real risk, no religion actually prohibits vaccinating under a mandate, and policing religious exemptions is very difficult.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rehnquist Legacy.Craig Bradley (ed.) - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
28 (#538,947)

6 months
16 (#138,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Case Against a Right to Religion-Based Exemptions.Ellis West - 1990 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 4 (3-4):591-638.

Add more references