The Adam Smith Review 10:189-214 (2017)

Mark R. Reiff
University of California, Davis
Within the Anglo-American world, economic liberalism is generally viewed as having only one progenitor—Adam Smith—and one offspring—neoliberalism. But it actually has two. The work of G. W. F. Hegel was also very influential on the development of economic liberalism, at least in the German-speaking world, and the most powerful contemporary instantiation of economic liberalism within that world is not neoliberlaism, but ordoliberalism, although this is generally unknown and certainly unacknowledged outside of Continental Europe. Accordingly, what I am going to be doing in this piece is trying to bring ordoliberalism more directly into the light—I will argue that by comparing and contrasting the views of Smith and Hegel or at least between how Smith and Hegel tend to be currently (mis)understood, we can better understand both the roots and the nature of these two contemporary incarnations of economic liberalism, and the light this sheds, in turn, brings some interesting and important features of these two contemporary theories into view. From Smith, for example, neoliberals took the idea of the invisible hand, although I am going to argue that contemporary advocates of invisible hand theory have largely misconstrued or at the very least overstated the significance of this metaphor. From Hegel, in contrast, ordoliberals took the idea of the civil society, and I will argue that the civil society is a much better metaphor not only for Hegel's but also for Smith's views. Indeed, I will argue that ordoliberalism, not neoliberalism, is a better and more coherent instantiation of economic liberalism than neoliberalism could ever be.
Keywords neoliberalism  ordoliberalism  Austrian economics  Hayek  von Mises  Adam Smith  Hegel  invisible hand  civil society  Ropke
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Institutional Economics.John R. Commons - 1935 - International Journal of Ethics 45 (4):474-476.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Adam Smith's Invisible Hand Argument.John D. Bishop - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):165 - 180.
God and the Market: Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand. [REVIEW]Paul Oslington - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):429 - 438.
The Invisible Hand of God in Adam Smith.Andy Denis - 2005 - Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 23 (A):1-32.
The Invisible Hand of Natural Selection, and Vice Versa.Toni Vogel Carey - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):427-442.
Invisible Hand Arguments: Milton Friedman and Adam Smith.Alistair M. Macleod - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (2):103-117.


Added to PP index

Total views
311 ( #33,071 of 2,497,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #28,236 of 2,497,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes