Mark R. Reiff
University of California, Davis
Rawls intended the difference principle to be a liberal egalitarian principle of justice. By that I mean he intended it to provide a moral justification for a moderate amount of redistribution of income from the most advantaged members of society to the least. But since the difference principle was introduced, economic inequality has increased dramatically, reaching levels now not seen since just before the Great Depression, levels that Rawls surely would have thought perverse. Many blame this increase on the rise of supply-side economics and the dramatic cuts in marginal tax rates enacted by the supply-siders for corporations and those already at the top of the income distribution. But I contend that the difference principle, or at least the ethos that the difference principle embodies and represents, is also partially to blame. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to explain how the difference principle, the ideas and arguments of the supply-siders, and this dramatic rise in inequality are connected, to identify where the difference principle went wrong, and to discuss what those who remain committed to the liberal egalitarian ideals that the difference principle was thought to represent might do about it.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3917/rpec.132.0119
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Difference Principle, Capitalism, and Property-Owning Democracy.Andrew Lister - 2018 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 5 (1):151-172.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rawls and Natural Aristocracy.Matthew Clayton - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):239-259.
Incentives, Inequality and Self-Respect.Richard Penny - 2013 - Res Publica 19 (4):335-351.
Rawls különbözeti elve (Rawls’ Difference Principle).Attila Tanyi - 2007 - Hungarian Review of Political Science (Politikatudomanyi Szemle) 16 (2):125-150.
Rawls, the Difference Principle, and Economic Inequality.Walter E. Schaller - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):368–391.
Xxxx. Xxxx - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):193-217.
The Difference Principle is Not Action-Guiding.Rupert Read - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):487-503.
Contractualism, Reciprocity, and Egalitarian Justice.Jonathan Quong - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (1):75-105.
Just Savings and the Difference Principle.Steven Wall - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (1):79-102.
Rawls' Paradox.Jason Brennan - 2007 - Constitutional Political Economy 18:287-299.


Added to PP index

Total views
88 ( #130,874 of 2,498,786 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,133 of 2,498,786 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes