Feminist Review 97 (1):5-31 (2011)

Abstract
The need to re-examine established ways of thinking about secularism and its relationship to feminism has arisen in the context of the confluence of a number of developments including: the increasing dominance of the ‘clash of civilizations’ thesis; the expansion of postmodern critiques of Enlightenment rationality to encompass questions of religion; and sustained critiques of the ‘secularization thesis’. Conflicts between the claims of women's equality and the claims of religion are well-documented vis-à-vis all major religions and across all regions. The ongoing moral panic about the presence of Islam in Europe, marked by a preoccupation with policing Muslim women's dress, reminds us of the centrality of women and gender power relations in the interrelation of religion, culture and the state. Added to postmodern and other critiques of the secular-religious binary, most sociological research now contradicts the equation of modernization with secularization. This article focuses on the challenges that these developments pose to politically oriented feminist thinking and practice. It argues that non-oppressive feminist responses require a new critical engagement with secularism as a normative principle in democratic, multicultural societies. To inform this process, the author maps and links discussions across different fields of feminist scholarship, in the sociology of religion and in political theory. She organizes the main philosophical traditions and fault lines that form the intellectual terrain at the intersection of feminism, religion and politics in two broad groups: feminist critiques of the Enlightenment critique of religion; and feminist scholarship at the critical edges of the Enlightenment tradition. The author argues that notwithstanding the fragmented nature of feminist debates in this area, common ground is emerging across different politically oriented approaches: all emphasize ‘democracy’ and the values that underpin it as the larger discursive frame in which the principle of secularism can be redefined with emancipatory intent in a neo-secular age.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1057/fr.2010.35
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?Susan Moller Okin (ed.) - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Space for Female Subjectivity in the Post-Secular?Mats Nilsson & Mekonnen Tesfahuney - 2019 - Theory, Culture and Society 36 (7-8):173-192.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Space for Female Subjectivity in the Post-Secular?Mats Nilsson & Mekonnen Tesfahuney - 2019 - Theory, Culture and Society 36 (7-8):173-192.
Is Secularism Neutral?Rex Ahdar - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (3):404-429.
Religion, Secularism, and a Democratic Politics of "As If".Ann Pellegrini - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1345-1350.
Rethinking the Secular in Feminist Marriage Debates.Ada S. Jaarsma - 2010 - Studies in Social Justice 4 (1):47-66.
"Religion, Secularism, and a Democratic Politics of" As If".Ann Pellegrini - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1345-1350.
Obama's Neo-New Deal: Religion, Secularism, and Sex in Political Debates Now.Janet Jakobsen & Ann Pellegrini - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1227-1254.
Obama's Neo-New Deal: Religion, Secularism, and Sex in Political Debates Now.Janet R. Jakobsen & Ann Pellegrini - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1227-1254.
The Secular and Secularisms.José Casanova - 2009 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1049-1066.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-24

Total views
3 ( #1,357,999 of 2,507,021 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,021 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes