Neutrality and Excellence

In Without Trimmings: The Legal, Moral, and Political Philosophy of Matthew Kramer. Oxford, UK: pp. 271-296 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Liberalism with Excellence, Matthew Kramer makes an argument for how excellence may enter in into liberalism, despite liberalism’s strong commitment to neutrality. Kramer seeks to challenge not only the uncompromising rejection of this position by liberals such a Jonathan Quong, but also the so-called “blended” approach of “soft-perfectionist” scholars such as Joseph Raz and George Sher. In this essay, I do not so much challenge Kramer’s approach as offer an alternative for accomplishing the same thing. Under my proposal, certain forms of excellence and neutrality can both be accommodated as long as state support for the form of excellence at issue is proportional to the support for such a form of excellence within the relevant polity, competing forms of excellence are non-rivalrous, and no one is forced to embrace a form of excellence with which they disagree. My proposal is therefore not what Ronald Dworkin derogatively characterized as “a checkerboard solution.” Rather than allowing the state to support contrary moral positions at one and the same time, it is a solution that takes morally compatible but nevertheless competing conceptions of excellence seriously, and exhibits neutrality by giving them proportional rather than full support. This neither forces anyone to pursue the particular forms of excellence the state supports nor prevents them from pursuing some other form of excellence entirely or, if they wish, no form of excellence at all.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-Government.Vivienne Brown - 2001 - The Monist 84 (1):60-76.
Self-Government.Vivienne Brown - 2001 - The Monist 84 (1):60-76.
Berlin’s two concepts of positive liberty.Janos Kis - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):31-48.
The Positive Foundation Of The Negative Liberty.Damian Leszczyński - 2012 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 7 (1):121-192.
From republican to liberal liberty.Eric Ghosh - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (1):132-167.
From Republican to Liberal Liberty.. Eric Ghosh - 2008 - History of Political Thought 29 (1):132-167.
Four Conceptions of Freedom.Horacio Spector - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (6):780-808.
Invigilating Republican Liberty.Gerald Lang - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):273-293.
Concepts and consequences of liberty: From Smith and mill to libertarian paternalism.David Meskill - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (1):86-106.
A Defense Against Attacks on Negative Liberty.Stuart Doyle - 2020 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 24 (2):317-322.
Animals Do Have an Interest in Liberty.Valéry Giroux - 2016 - Journal of Animal Ethics 6 (1):20-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-29

Downloads
118 (#146,572)

6 months
78 (#53,450)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark R. Reiff
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

Hope in an Illiberal Age? [REVIEW]Mark R. Reiff - 2024 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 2024 (January):1-9.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proportionality, Winner-Take-All, and Distributive Justice.Mark R. Reiff - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):5-42.

Add more references