Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (3):237-268 (2014)

Mark R. Reiff
University of California, Davis
Some theorists believe that there is a plurality of values, and that in many circumstances these values are incommensurable, or at least incomparable. Others believe that all values are reducible to a single super-value, or that even if there is a plurality of irreducible values these values are commensurable. But I will argue that both sides have got it wrong. Values are neither commensurable nor incommensurable, at least not in the way most people think. We are free to believe in incommensurability or not, depending on what particular conception of morality we want to embrace. Incommensurability is accordingly not a theory about value. It is a presupposition that provides a necessary background condition for a certain kind of value to exist. It is therefore not the kind of view that can be morally true or false. As a presupposition, it can only be accepted or rejected on grounds that do not presuppose that morality already exists. Incommensurability is, like the rejection of hard determinism, one of the presuppositions on which morality as we know it happens to be based
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X13483481
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.

View all 70 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Impossibility of Incommensurable Values.Chris Kelly - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (3):369 - 382.
The Main Argument for Value Incommensurability (and Why It Fails).Stephen Ellis - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):27-43.
Practical Incommensurability and the Phenomenological Basis of Robust Realism.Mark A. Wrathall - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):79 – 88.
Multisemiosis and Incommensurability.S. K. Arun Murthi & Sundar Sarukkai - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):297-311.
Value Incommensurability.Stephen R. Grimm - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:221-232.
Pragmatic Incommensurability.John Collier - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:146 - 153.
Are There Rival, Incommensurable Theories?Dale W. Moberg - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):244-262.


Added to PP index

Total views
488 ( #18,093 of 2,498,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #11,493 of 2,498,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes