From Geometry to Geology: An Invitation to Mathematical Pluralism Through the Phenomenon of Independence

Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (2):289-308 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores how a pluralist view can arise in a natural way out of the day-to-day practice of modern set theory. By contrast, the widely accepted orthodox view is that there is an ultimate universe of sets V, and it is in this universe that mathematics takes place. From this view, the purpose of set theory is “learning the truth about V.” It has become apparent, however, that the phenomenon of independence—those questions left unresolved by the axioms—holds a central place in the investigation. This paper introduces the notion of independence, explores the primary tool for establishing independence results, and shows how a plurality of models arises through the investigation of this phenomenon. Building on a familiar example from Euclidean geometry, a template for independence proofs is established. Applying this template in the domain of set theory leads to a consideration of forcing, the tool par excellence for constructing universes of sets. Fifty years of forcing has resulted in a profusion of universes exhibiting a wide variety of characteristics—a multiverse of set theories. Direct study of this multiverse presents technical challenges due to its second-order nature. Nonetheless, there are certain nice “local neighborhoods” of the multiverse that are amenable to first-order analysis, and set-theoretic geology studies just such a neighborhood, the collection of grounds of a given universe V of set theory. I will explore some of the properties of this collection, touching on major concepts, open questions, and recent developments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A note on parallelism in affine geometry.Peter Schreiber - 1993 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39 (1):131-132.
Mathematical platonism meets ontological pluralism?Matteo Plebani - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-19.
Essays on the foundations of mathematics.Moritz Pasch - 2010 - New York: Springer. Edited by Stephen Pollard.
Forms of the Pasch axiom in ordered geometry.Victor Pambuccian - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (1):29-34.
Independence logic and abstract independence relations.Gianluca Paolini - 2015 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 61 (3):202-216.
Alexander Catcott: Glory and Geology.Michael Neve & Roy Porter - 1977 - British Journal for the History of Science 10 (1):37-60.
Analysis and synthesis in John Playfair's Elements of Geometry.Amy Ackerberg-Hastings - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Science 35 (1):43-72.
The Modal Multilogic of Geometry.Philippe Balbiani - 1998 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 8 (3):259-281.
Ternary operations as primitive notions for plane geometry II.Victor Pambuccian - 1992 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 38 (1):345-348.
Progress in Mathematics: Descartes' "Geometry".Aaron John Lercher - 1999 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
The Very Thought of (Wronging) You.Ariel Zylberman - 2014 - Philosophical Topics 42 (1):153-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-28

Downloads
6 (#1,425,536)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The mathematical experience.Philip J. Davis - 1981 - Boston: Birkhäuser. Edited by Reuben Hersh & Elena Marchisotto.
The set-theoretic multiverse.Joel David Hamkins - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):416-449.
Set-theoretic geology.Gunter Fuchs, Joel David Hamkins & Jonas Reitz - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (4):464-501.
The Ground Axiom.Jonas Reitz - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1299 - 1317.

Add more references