Argumentation Theory and the Philosophy of Science Since Kuhn

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Normal science and the extension of theories.Jack C. Carloye - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):241-256.
Critical Science Studies as Argumentation Theory: Who’s Afraid of SSK?William Rehg - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):33-48.
Did Tom Kuhn actually meet Tom bayes?Lefteris Farmakis - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (1):41 - 53.
Kuhnian puzzle solving and schema theory.Thomas Nickles - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):255.
Carnap, Kuhn, and revisionism: On the publication of structure in encyclopedia. [REVIEW]J. C. Pinto de Oliveira - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):147-157.
Thomas Kuhn on revolution and Paul Feyerabend on anarchy.Thomas J. Hickey - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):102-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Rehg
Saint Louis University

Citations of this work

Eleven Ways to Critique an Article.Mike Metcalfe - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references