Women’s Perceptions of Childbirth Risk and Place of Birth

Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (3):239-252 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the United States, clinical interventions such as epidurals, intravenous infusions, oxytocin, and intrauterine pressure catheters are used almost routinely in births in the hospital setting, despite evidence that the overutilization of such interventions likely plays a key role in increasing the need for cesarean section (CS). In 2010, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 32.8 percent of births in the U.S. were by CS. The U.S. National Institutes of Health has reported that CS increases avoidable maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. To increase understanding of what might motivate the overuse of CS in the U.S., we investigated the factors that influenced women’s decision making around childbirth, because women’s conscious and unconscious choices about giving birth could influence whether they would choose or allow delivery by CS.In this article, we report findings about women’s decisions related to place of birth—at home or in a hospital. We found that choosing a place of birth was significant in how women in our study attempted to mitigate their perceptions of the risks of childbirth for themselves and their infant. Concern for the safety of the infant was a central, driving factor in the decisions women made about giving birth, and this concern heightened their perceptions of the risks of childbirth. Heightened perceptions of risk about the safety of the fetus during childbirth were found to affect women’s ability to accurately assess the risk of using clinical interventions such as the time of admission, epidural anesthesia, oxytocin, or cesarean birth, which has important implications for clinical practice, prenatal education, perinatal research, medical decision making, and informed consent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hooked Up.Tanya N. Cook - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):45-61.
Shame, gender, birth.Anne Drapkin Lyerly - 2006 - Hypatia 21 (1):101-118.
Risky Business: Framing Childbirth in Hospital Settings.Bernice L. Hausman - 2005 - Journal of Medical Humanities 26 (1):23-38.
Metaphysical Violence and Medicalized Childbirth.Allison B. Wolf - 2013 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):101-111.
The home birth movement in the united states.Bonnie B. O'Connor - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (2):147-174.
Wartime women giving birth: Narratives of pregnancy and childbirth, Britain c. 1939–1960.Angela Davis - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:257-266.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-13

Downloads
25 (#598,332)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Home Birth and the Maternity Outcomes Emergency: Attending to Race and Gender in Childbirth.Susan A. Stark - 2021 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 14 (1):2-18.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references