The problem of the trinity in Whitehead's philosophy of God

Modern Schoolman 62 (4):317 - 335 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES THREE QUESTIONS: (1) HOW CAN A TRIUNE NOTION OF GOD BE ACCOMMODATED IN WHITEHEAD’S DI-POLAR THEISM? (2) HOW CAN GOD BE THREE PERSONS AND YET ONE ACTUAL ENTITY? AND (3) HOW CAN GOD BE BOTH IMMANENT AND TRANSCENDENT? AFTER LOOKING AT THE WORK OF JOSEPH BRACKEN, S J AND LEWIS FORD ON THESE QUESTIONS, IT IS CONCLUDED THAT WHITEHEAD’S PHILOSOPHY CANNOT SERVE AS THE GROUND FOR A TRADITIONAL INTERPRETATION OF TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY WITHOUT INVOLVING MAJOR DISTORTIONS OF HIS ORIGINAL POSITION

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Process trinitarianism.Lewis S. Ford - 1975 - Journal of the American Academy of Religion 43:199 - 213.
The Dynamic God.Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki - 2010 - Process Studies 39 (1):39-58.
Can Thomas and Whitehead Complement Each Other?Lewis S. Ford - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):491-502.
God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him.Elmer L. Towns - 2009 - Regal Books. Edited by Charles Billingsley.
A Latin Trinity.Brian Leftow - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):304-333.
Matter and God in Rahner and Whitehead.Robert E. Doud - 1993 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):63-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-16

Downloads
40 (#389,966)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas J. Regan
Loyola University, Chicago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references