Ethical challenges of edtech, big data and personalized learning: twenty-first century student sorting and tracking

Ethics and Information Technology 21 (3):167-179 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With the increase in the costs of providing education and concerns about financial responsibility, heightened consideration of accountability and results, elevated awareness of the range of teacher skills and student learning styles and needs, more focus is being placed on the promises offered by online software and educational technology. One of the most heavily marketed, exciting and controversial applications of edtech involves the varied educational programs to which different students are exposed based on how big data applications have evaluated their likely learning profiles. Characterized most often as ‘personalized learning,’ these programs raise a number of ethical concerns especially when used at the K-12 level. This paper analyzes the range of these ethical concerns arguing that characterizing them under the general rubric of ‘privacy’ oversimplifies the concerns and makes it too easy for advocates to dismiss or minimize them. Six distinct ethical concerns are identified: information privacy; anonymity; surveillance; autonomy; non-discrimination; and ownership of information. Particular attention is paid to whether personalized learning programs raise concerns similar to those raised about educational tracking in the 1950s. The paper closes with discussion of three themes that are important to consider in ethical and policy discussions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reference framework for active learning in higher education.Pranav Naithani - 2008 - In Abdulla Al-Hawaj, Wajeeh Elali & E. H. Twizell (eds.), Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Issues and Challenges. Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 113-120.
Building an ACT‐R Reader for Eye‐Tracking Corpus Data.Jakub Dotlačil - 2018 - Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (1):144-160.
The church's legal challenges in the twenty-first century.John Witte Jr - 1996 - In Andrew R. Cecil & W. Lawson Taitte (eds.), Moral Values: The Challenge of the Twenty-First Century. the University of Texas Press.
Ethical Profiling.Michael Boylan - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (1-2):131 - 145.
The Instructional Challenges of Student Plagiarism.Erika Löfström & Pauliina Kupila - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):231-242.
From a Student’s Perspective.Barry Sharpe & Reba West - 2015 - Teaching Ethics 15 (2):337-348.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-04

Downloads
73 (#221,304)

6 months
23 (#115,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Privacy and Freedom.Alan F. Westin - 1970 - Science and Society 34 (3):360-363.
Prediction, pre-emption, presumption.Ian Kerr - 2013 - In Mireille Hildebrandt & Katja de Vries (eds.), Privacy, due process and the computational turn. Abingdon, Oxon, [England] ; New York: Routledge. pp. 91.

Add more references