Against evaluator relativity: A response to Sen

Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (2):93-112 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Values, reasons and perspectives.Alan Thomas - 1997 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (1):61–80.
The prajâpati test : Response to Amartya Sen.Marcel Hénaff - 2009 - In Reiko Gotoh & Paul Dumouchel (eds.), Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
Response.Amartya Sen - 2009 - In Reiko Gotoh & Paul Dumouchel (eds.), Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
Evaluator relativity and consequential evaluation.Amartya Sen - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (2):113-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#258,521)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Metaethics After Moore.Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.) - 2006 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
The Moral Standing of the Market.Amartya Sen - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):1.
Two kinds of consequentialism.Michael Smith - 2009 - Philosophical Issues 19 (1):257-272.
Kinds of consequentialism.Michael Smith - 2009 - In Ernest Sosa & Enrique Villanueva (eds.), Metaethics. Wiley Periodicals. pp. 257-272.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references