The undead Darwin: iconic narrative, scientific controversy and the history of science

History of Science 47 (4):445-458 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/007327530904700406

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Dead Serious: Evil and the Ontology of the Undead.Manuel Vargas - 2006 - In Richard Greene & K. Silem Mohammed (eds.), The Undead and Philosophy. Open Court.
Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? [REVIEW]Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):271-282.
Visions of International Scientific Cooperation: The Case of Oceanic Science, 1920–1955. [REVIEW]Jacob Darwin Hamblin - 2000 - Minerva 38 (4):393-423.
Constructing Audiences in Scientific Controversy.Jason A. Delborne - 2011 - Social Epistemology 25 (1):67-95.
Rle: History & Philosophy of Science: 34-Volume Set.Georg Henrik Wright - 1935 - Routledge.
Darwin’s Sublime: The Contest Between Reason and Imagination in On the Origin of Species. [REVIEW]Benjamin Sylvester Bradley - 2011 - Journal of the History of Biology 44 (2):205 - 232.
Dialogues, notes, essays, letters and diaries. An analytical proposal regarding the contribution of literature to the society of knowledge.Emanuele Coco - 2009 - Axiomathes 19 (4):401-415.
Dog fight: Darwin as animal advocate in the antivivisection controversy of 1875.David Allan Feller - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (4):265-271.
Darwin’s Natural Selection and the Need for a Kuhnian Apology.Sean9 Winkler - 2010 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 66 (4):919 - 930.
The Logical Skeleton of Darwin's Historical Methodology.Mary B. Williams - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:514 - 521.
The narrative reconstruction of science.Joseph Rouse - 1990 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):179 – 196.
Disbelieving Darwin--and feeling no shame!William Dembski - manuscript
Darwin the writer.George Levine - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-25

Downloads
13 (#1,006,512)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Down under Darwin: Australasian perspectives on Darwin Studies.Ian Hesketh, Ruth Barton & Evelleen Richards - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 103 (C):69-76.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Opening Pandora's Box. A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse.G. Nigel Gilbert & Michael Mulkay - 1985 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 175 (1):70-71.

Add more references