- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Structured Arguments and Their Aggregation: A Reply to Selinger
Argumentation 28 (3):395-399 (2014)
Abstract
Selinger provides a new take on what is being referred to in the computational literature as ‘structured argumentation’. In this commentary the differences and similarities with existing work are highlighted as a way of demonstrating how philosophical and computational approaches to argumentation are increasingly coming together and complementing one anotherMy notes
Similar books and articles
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.Henry Prakken - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):93-124.
Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation via the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation.Bas van Gijzel & Henry Prakken - 2012 - Argument and Computation 3 (1):21 - 47.
Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics.Henry Prakken - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):57-82.
Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2007 - Social Choice and Welfare 29 (1):19-33.
Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective.Christian List - 2005 - Episteme 2 (1):25-38.
Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems.James F. Voss - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):321-329.
Two aggregation paradoxes in social decision making: the Ostrogorski paradox and the discursive dilemma.Gabriella Pigozzi - 2006 - Episteme 2 (2):119-128.
The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review.Christian List - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):179-207.
Structured models of semantic cognition.Charles Kemp & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):717-718.
Fusion rules for context-dependent aggregation of structured news reports.Anthony Hunter & Rupert Summerton - 2004 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14 (3):329-366.
Argumentation mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-08-01
Downloads
17 (#846,424)
6 months
1 (#1,510,037)
2014-08-01
Downloads
17 (#846,424)
6 months
1 (#1,510,037)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments: a theory of argument structure.James B. Freeman - 1991 - Berlin ; New York: Foris Publications.
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.Henry Prakken - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):93-124.
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms.Martin Caminada & Leila Amgoud - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (5-6):286-310.
Abstract argumentation systems.Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence 90 (1-2):225-279.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo