Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences

University of Chicago Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For the past fifty years anxiety over naturalism has driven debates in social theory. One side sees social science as another kind of natural science, while the other rejects the possibility of objective and explanatory knowledge. _Interpretation and Social Knowledge_ suggests a different route, offering a way forward for an antinaturalist sociology that overcomes the opposition between interpretation and explanation and uses theory to build concrete, historically specific causal explanations of social phenomena

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of Sociology.Daniel Little - 2010-01-04 - In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 293–323.
Science for social scientists.John Law - 1984 - London: Macmillan Press. Edited by Peter Lodge.
Knowledge and the social sciences: theory, method, practice.David Goldblatt (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Routledge, in association with Open University.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-21

Downloads
31 (#514,403)

6 months
4 (#1,055,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

For a postcolonial sociology.Julian Go - 2013 - Theory and Society 42 (1):25-55.
Theoretical Foundations for Digital Text Analysis.Gabe Ignatow - 2016 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 46 (1):104-120.
Re-Imagining Social Science.Timothy Rutzou - 2016 - Journal of Critical Realism 15 (4):327-341.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references