Ethics and Information Technology 23 (4):777-789 (2021)

In this paper, we explore and describe what is needed to allow connected and automated vehicles to break traffic rules in order to minimise road safety risk and to operate with appropriate transparency. Reviewing current traffic rules with particular reference to two driving situations, we illustrate why current traffic rules are not suitable for CAVs and why making new traffic rules specifically for CAVs would be inappropriate. In defining an alternative approach to achieving safe CAV driving behaviours, we describe the use of ethical goal functions as part of hybrid AI systems, suggesting that functions should be defined by governmental bodies with input from citizens and stakeholders. Ethical goal functions for CAVs would enable developers to optimise driving behaviours for safety under conditions of uncertainty whilst allowing for differentiation of products according to brand values. Such functions can differ between regions according to preferences for safety behaviours within that region and can be updated over time, responding to continual socio-technological feedback loops. We conclude that defining ethical goal functions is an urgent and necessary step from governmental bodies to enable the safe and transparent operation of CAVs and accelerate the reduction in road casualties they promise to achieve.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-021-09614-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Problem of Making Autonomous Vehicles Conform to Traffic Law.Henry Prakken - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3):341-363.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Making Road Traffic Safer: Reply to Ori.Sven Ove Hansson - 2014 - Philosophical Papers 43 (3):365-375.
No Ethics Settings for Autonomous Vehicles.Tomislav Bracanovic - 2019 - Hungarian Philosophical Review 63 (4):47-60.
Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles.Geoff Keeling - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (1):293-307.
Why Not Road Ethics?Meshi Ori - 2020 - Theoria 86 (3):389-412.
Automated Vehicles, Big Data and Public Health.David Shaw, Bernard Favrat & Bernice Elger - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (1):35-42.
Night Time Vehicle Detection.Iman A. Mohammed & Hasan Fleyeh - 2012 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 21 (2):143-165.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,071,959 of 2,519,855 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,465 of 2,519,855 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes