On Neyman's paradox and the theory of statistical tests

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):265-271 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and neyman–pearson.Johannes Lenhard - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
Resolving Neyman's paradox.Max Albert - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):69-76.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
The logic of tests of significance.Stephen Spielman - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (3):211-226.
Of Nulls and Norms.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:280 - 290.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#374,850)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Theories of probability.Colin Howson - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):1-32.
Resolving Neyman's paradox.Max Albert - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):69-76.
Die Falsifikation Statistischer Hypothesen/The falsification of statistical hypotheses.Max Albert - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):1-32.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Foundations of science.Norman Robert Campbell - 1920 - New York,: Dover Publications.
Has Mendel's work been rediscovered?R. Fisher - 1936 - Annals of Science 1 (2):115-137.
A falsifying rule for probability statements.Donald A. Gillies - 1971 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):231-261.
On the infirmities of Gillies's rule.Stephen Spielman - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):261-265.
A comment on Gillies's falsifying rule for probability statements.J. De Maré - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23:335.

View all 6 references / Add more references