- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Character in the Criminal Trial
Oxford University Press (2015)
Abstract
The use of character in the criminal trial raises a number of controversial issues such as the nature of criminal responsibility, the link between past and future behaviour, and the way juries and judges reason about evidence of prior wrongdoing. This book reassesses and reflects on the significance of the law's increasing emphasis on character.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Defending the Criminal Law: Reflections on the Changing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions.Andrew Ashworth & Lucia Zedner - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):21-51.
Blame, moral standing and the legitimacy of the criminal trial.R. A. Duff - 2010 - Ratio 23 (2):123-140.
The Juror, the Citizen, and the Human Being: The Presumption of Innocence and the Burden of Judgment. [REVIEW]Sherman J. Clark - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):421-429.
The Criminal Trial, the Rule of Law and the Exclusion of Unlawfully Obtained Evidence.Hock Lai Ho - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (1):109-131.
Character, purpose, and criminal responsibility.Michael D. Bayles - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):5 - 20.
Suspicious Minds: An Analysis of Insanity and Legal Accountability in American Criminal Law.Jessica O. Laird - unknown
Blame, Moral Standing and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Trial.Antony Duff - 2010 - Ratio 23 (2):123-140.
Criminal and Procedural Fairness: Some Challenges to the Presumption of Innocence. [REVIEW]Magnus Ulväng - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):469-484.
Law, Language and Community: Some Preconditions of Criminal Liability.R. Duff - 1998 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (2):189-206.
Space, time and function: intersecting principles of responsibility across the terrain of criminal justice. [REVIEW]Nicola Lacey - 2007 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):233-250.
The Right to be Presumed Innocent.Hamish Stewart - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):407-420.
Pre-Trial Proceedings in the Czech Republic.Marek Frystak - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 121 (3):251-267.
Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment.Katrina Sifferd - 2012 - In Daniel Seltzer (ed.), The Social Scale: The Weight of Justice. MIT Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-06-11
Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)
6 months
5 (#544,079)
2015-06-11
Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)
6 months
5 (#544,079)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
When statistical evidence is not specific enough.Marcello Di Bello - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):12251-12269.
Risk and Responsibility in Context.Adriana Placani & Stearns Broadhead (eds.) - 2023 - New York: Routledge.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-tstkh uwo