The Fodorian fallacy

Analysis 62 (4):285-89 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent years Fodor has repeatedly argued that nothing epistemic can be essential to, or constitutive of, any concept. This holds in virtue of a constraint which Fodor dubs the Compositionality Constraint. I show that Fodor's argument is fallacious because it rests on an ambiguity.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
463 (#39,069)

6 months
55 (#73,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francois Recanati
Institut Jean Nicod

Citations of this work

Learnability and compositionality.Douglas Patterson - 2005 - Mind and Language 20 (3):326–352.
Coping with informational atomism - one of Jerry Fodor’s legacies.Pierre Jacob - 2020 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 11 (1):19-41.
The notion of a recognitional concept and other confusions.Malte Dahlgrün - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (1):139 - 160.
Perceptual warrant and internal access.John Zeimbekis - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 180 (1):191-206.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Science and Values.Harold I. Brown & Larry Laudan - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (3):439.
Language, Thought and Compositionality.Jerry Fodor - 2001 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 48:227-242.

Add more references