Literal Meaning

New York: Cambridge University Press (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the dominant position among philosophers of language today, we can legitimately ascribe determinate contents to natural language sentences, independently of what the speaker actually means. This view contrasts with that held by ordinary language philosophers fifty years ago: according to them, speech acts, not sentences, are the primary bearers of content. François Recanati argues for the relevance of this controversy to the current debate about semantics and pragmatics. Is 'what is said' determined by linguistic conventions, or is it an aspect of 'speaker's meaning'? Do we need pragmatics to fix truth-conditions? What is 'literal meaning'? To what extent is semantic composition a creative process? How pervasive is context-sensitivity? Recanati provides an original and insightful defence of 'contextualism', and offers an informed survey of the spectrum of positions held by linguists and philosophers working at the semantics/pragmatics interface.

Other Versions

original Recanati, François (2004) "Literal meaning". Cambridge University Press

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,109

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Literal meaning.François Recanati (ed.) - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Folk psychology and literal meaning.Robert M. Harnish - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (2):383-400.
Is Literal Meaning Conventional?Andrei Marmor - 2008 - Topoi 27 (1-2):101-113.
What is Literal Meaning?John-Michael Kuczynski - 2014 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 46 (1-4).
Literal Meaning & Cognitive Content.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2015 - Madison, WI, USA: Freud Institute.
Austin on Literal Meaning.Odai Al Zoubi - 2016 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):41-64.
Review of Francois Recanati, Literal meaning. [REVIEW]Kent Bach - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):487–492.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
203 (#110,500)

6 months
21 (#132,646)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mental Files.François Récanati - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Semantics without semantic content.Daniel W. Harris - 2020 - Mind and Language 37 (3):304-328.
Perspective in taste predicates and epistemic modals.Johnathan Schaffer - 2011 - In Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions.Robyn Carston - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (1):108-133.

View all 467 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Elements of symbolic logic.Hans Reichenbach - 1966 - London: Dover Publications.
Thought without Representation.John Perry & Simon Blackburn - 1986 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 60 (1):137-166.
Elements of Symbolic Logic.Nelson Goodman - 1948 - Philosophical Review 57 (1):100.

Add more references