Deferential Concepts: A Response to Woodfield

Mind and Language 15 (4):452-464 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,408

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deferential concepts: A response to Woodfield.François Recanati - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (4):452–464.
Modes of presentation: perceptual vs deferential.Francois Recanati - 2001 - In Albert Newen, Ulrich Nortmann & Rainer Stuehlmann-Laeisz (eds.), Building on Frege: New Essays on Sense, Content, and Concept. CSLI Stanford. pp. 197-208.
The Social Value of Non-Deferential Belief.Allan Hazlett - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (1):131-151.
Fodor, JA-Concepts.A. Woodfield - 1999 - Philosophical Books 40:47-48.
Teleology.Andrew Woodfield - 1976 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Which theoretical concepts do children use?Andrew Woodfield - 1996 - Philosophical Papers 25 (1):1-20.
How (not) to specify normal conditions for response-dependent concepts.Jussi Haukioja - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):325 – 331.
Acceptance-dependence: A social kind of response-dependence.Frank A. Hindriks - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):481–498.
Response-Dependence.Christine Tappolet & Roberto Casati - 1998 - European Review of Philosophy 3:227.
Epistemic boundedness and the universality of thought.Matthew Rellihan - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (2):219-250.
On the Deferential Use of Phenomenal Concepts.Julia Telles de Menezes - 2016 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 72 (2-3):573-596.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-23

Downloads
6 (#1,254,858)

6 months
2 (#640,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references