Argumentation 4 (1):35-52 (1990)

Abstract
Rhetoric and dialectic are two distinct circles, but in intersection. Rhetoric is an application (among others) of the dialectic to public debates. The dialectic is then the intellectual tool of rhetoric, distinct from its emotive means of persuading. But each of them can be antistrophos to the other one because both of them belong to the same “sublunar world”, our world. Such is Aristotle's answer, both to the sophists and to Plato
Keywords Rhetoric  dialectic  game  rule  persuasion  proof
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00186297
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

La Prudence Chez Aristote.Pierre Aubenque - 1963 - Presses Universitaires de France.
Aristote.W. D. Ross - 1971 - Gordon & Breach.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logic or Rhetoric in Law?Alain Lempereur - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (3):283-297.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rhetoric and Philosophy in Plato's Phaedrus.Daniel Werner - 2010 - Greece and Rome 57 (1):21-46.
A Case for Kenneth Burke's Dialectic and Rhetoric.Timothy W. Crusius - 1986 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 19 (1):23 - 37.
Can Rhetoric and Dialectic Serve the Purposes of Logic?William D. Harpine - 1985 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 18 (2):96 - 112.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-21

Total views
26 ( #436,302 of 2,498,253 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,253 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes