What Emerged: Autonomy and Heteronomy in the Groundwork and Second _Critique_

In Stefano Bacin (ed.), The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 176-195 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explains Kant’s idea of autonomy of the will and advances a thesis about how it emerges in his moral conception. Kant defines “autonomy” as “the property of the will by which it is a law to itself…” and argues that the Categorical Imperative is that law. I take the autonomy of the will to mean that the nature of rational volition is the source of the formal principle that authoritatively governs rational volition. I give a sense to this idea by pointing to an argument form found throughout the Groundwork and the second Critique where Kant moves from a conception of rational volition as a faculty to a statement of its formal principle. This idea of autonomy emerges in Kant’s moral conception (at the time he writes the Groundwork) as his solution to the problem of moral theory. Common sense assumes that moral requirements apply with unconditional necessity, and the problem of moral theory is to show how such requirements are possible. Kant’s resolution to this problem is to argue that the necessity of moral requirement is genuine only if based in autonomy of the will, only if based in a “law that arises from one’s will”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Oughtonomy in healthcare. A deconstructive reading of Kantian autonomy.Ignaas Devisch - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (4):303-312.
• Freedom and Heteronomy: An Essay on the Liberal Society,.Aleksandar Fatić - 2009 - Institute for International Politics and Economics.
Kantian Autonomy.Terence Irwin - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 55:137-164.
Heteronomous Citizenship: Civic virtue and the chains of autonomy.Lucas Swaine - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):73-93.
Introduction to Moral Heteronomy. History, Proposals, Arguments.Daniele Bertini - 2017 - Dialegesthai. Rivista Telematica di Filosofia 19 (Thematic issue).
Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory: Selected Essays.Andrews Reath - 2006 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Progress in medicine: autonomy, oughtonomy and nudging.Ignaas Devisch - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):857-861.
Ethics States V. Lypynsky: the problem of the foundations and essence of political morality.V. Datsenko - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 3 (22):97-103.
The Heteronomy of Modern Jewish Philosophy.Michael Zank - 2012 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 20 (1):99-134.
Hedonism, Heteronomy and Kant's Principle of Happiness.Andrews Reath - 1989 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (1):42-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrews Reath
University of California, Riverside

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2018.Margit Ruffing - 2020 - Kant Studien 111 (4):647-702.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references